“Before the Big Bang?” (2005), the original lecture by Roger Penrose (part 7 of 9)

“Before the Big Bang? A new perspective on the Weyl curvature hypothesis” This is the original lecture by Roger Penrose on his fascinating new model of the universe, its origin and future, and of the “Big Bang”; held at the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences (November 7th 2005). Originally published at www.newton.ac.uk See also www.youtube.com and www.perimeterinstitute.ca for other lectures by Penrose on this theory. See also www.youtube.com for an interview with Roger Penrose on his new model. See also accelconf.web.cern.ch for Penrose’s academic article about his theory. See also arxiv.org for an article about Penrose’s “Before the Big Bang” idea, verifying that some of Penrose’s basic predictions are mathematically correct. NOTE TO THOSE POSTING COMMENTS ON THESE VIDEOS: Please stay focused on the topic. All irrelevant comments will be removed without warning. SUMMARY: There is now a great deal of evidence confirming the existence of a very hot and dense early stage of the universe. Much of this data comes from a detailed study of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)—radiation from the early universe that was most recently measured by NASA’s WMAP satellite. But the information presents new puzzles for scientists. One of the most blatant examples is an apparent paradox related to the second law of thermodynamics. Although some have argued that the hypothesis of inflationary cosmology solves some of the puzzles, profound issues remain. In this talk
Video Rating: 5 / 5

20 Responses to ““Before the Big Bang?” (2005), the original lecture by Roger Penrose (part 7 of 9)”

  • zilbiol:

    when does he cut to the punch?

  • sandustanBrasov:

    SandustanBrasov
    And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
    My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com
    You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel

    Dark energy is the ethereal energy and this can be harness it!

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    SandustanBrasov
    The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars. That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell – transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!

  • sandustanBrasov:

    SandustanBrasov
    The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7…8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    The science has and history. In the Fundamental Principle of Democrit(470..380BC) it show:”From nothing nothing’s born, nothing that exist can not be destroyed and any transformation consist from a reunion and separation…Out of atoms and ether. all rest is not otherwise than rationament and not exist…The spirit as well as the ether consist of a small and spherical atoms, very mobile, atoms that their movement form the phenomenon of life”.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    Through the relativity theory to Einstein of over century, it hold with strenght -as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. from relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, Big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now in 2011, the disciples of the Einstein, preach with contumely as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    It popularize the fantastical theories and stantardized theories with which it terrorize the inhabitants the Earth, after what Einstein with relativity theory had blocked the science of the century XX. Sptephen Hawking and Roger Penrose had demonstrated in 1967 that the black holes proceed from the relativity theory.How it can conceive and it can say that the heart of the one black hole is a gravitational singularity whose volume tend to zero and whose mass tend to infinite?

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein.

  • sandustanBrasov:

    • SandustanBrasov
    In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn’t a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies’ movement – the light speed – and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.

  • commodoreherring:

    @Schpwuette sorry, when i said it sweeps out a diamond shape i should have said it sweeps out a kind of double cone. anyway it’s good practice to try and visualise this for yourself…

  • commodoreherring:

    @Schpwuette by the way, the “symmetry axis” bit is the easiest to understand: imagine rotating the whole picture (into and out of the computer screen) 360 degrees around the orange dotted line, in order to sweep out a chunk of 3d space. this represents the universe. so for example the triangular one labelled “Minkowski Space” sweeps out a diamond shape with the “symmetry axis” running up through the middle. it’s the penrose diagram for empty space with no black hole. hope this makes sense…

  • commodoreherring:

    @Schpwuette yeah they’re quite technical drawings and he doesn’t really explain them in this talk, so if you didn’t know them before it’s not a surprise to be still mystified afterwards. they are called penrose diagrams but he’s too modest to refer to them by that name. it’s an abstract way of illustrating all the relativistic “horizons” that exist in a particular geometry. i think you can safely “skim over” it and still get the crux of his idea – they are not central to the argument.

  • Schpwuette:

    Goddamn. I was struggling since part, say, 4, but now he’s completely lost me.
    These ‘symmetry axis’ diagrams of his, I just don’t get them.
    It’s to be expected I guess…

  • leporidus:

    Wow, Dyson and Krauss referenced by Penrose (3:40). Very cool! If I knew Lawrence Kraus had published since the 1990s, I would have had my eyes on his work for a much longer time. (I’ve read »The Emperor’s New Mind« in 1993 with no mention of Krauss nor Dyson).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories
Sponsored Links